![thought train apple thought train apple](https://dcslyrics.com/wp-content/uploads/throttlerod-rabbit.jpg)
So here are the puzzle pieces that Einstein had in 1912: a) Space-time must be involved somehow, b) acceleration and gravity are intimately linked, and c) some accelerations need to be described by curved geometries.
![thought train apple thought train apple](https://i.etsystatic.com/23675759/r/il/b07f2c/2638536334/il_fullxfull.2638536334_gjkq.jpg)
![thought train apple thought train apple](https://is1-ssl.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/HOVZX_AYQMWdOFSOMr_Y_g/1200x675mf.jpg)
Now, accelerate the ride such that it's rotating at close to the speed of light. Imagine a specially designed merry-go-round, with all the horses lined up nose to tail, forming a perfect circle around the perimeter. And to do it, you could almost say, he had to think in circles. It's such a big leap that he spent five years just tinkering around with the implications of gravity = acceleration before he could make the next jump. Round and round we goĮinstein had to make one more big leap to get us to modern gravity. The implication is clear (or at least, it was clear to Einstein): Gravity causes acceleration, and acceleration causes gravity. If we removed the floor altogether, the apple and milk would simply stay put as the rocket zoomed away.īut inside the rocket ,you would just think it's normal gravity: Objects are falling, as they are wont to do, and all at the same rate. From outside the spaceship, it's easy to see why: The apple and milk aren't really moving, but the rocket is accelerating forward, "meeting" the dropped items. Drop a jug of milk - it falls to the floor at the exact same rate. Unless you looked outside and noticed that only a worryingly thin piece of glass separated you from the vacuum of space, you would have no idea that you were part of some grotesque science experiment.ĭrop an apple - it falls to the floor. Let's further assume that the rocket is perfectly quiet, so there's no immediate giveaway that you're on that spaceship. Suppose that in the middle of the night, we relocated your bedroom to the interior of a rocket, launched the craft into space (you're a heavy sleeper) and sent it flying away with the engines purring, providing a constant 1 g acceleration, the same acceleration you would feel on the Earth. Then, Einstein took it another step further. Lurking in the shadows of gravity was his precious special relativity and the essential concept of space-time, and what made that realization possible was the elevation of the equivalence between inertial and gravitational masses into a fundamental principle, rather than the awkward afterthought it had been. But zero-gravity environments are precisely the playground of Special Relativity, the theory he had cooked up just a couple years prior that wove our conceptions of space and time into the unified fabric of spacetime. Again neglecting air resistance, your inertial and gravitational masses would cancel, making you feel perfectly weightless, as if there were no gravity at all. The physicist imagined what would happen if you were to fall from a great height. This odd correspondence had long been a puzzle in gravitational circles, but in 1907, Einstein took it one step further. Inertial and gravitational masses move in perfect lockstep. For an object with twice the mass, the Earth may pull on it twice as strongly, but this is perfectly canceled out by the fact that it's now twice as hard to get the object moving. Thus for Newton's theory to work, inertial mass had to be the same as gravitational mass, but only by sheer coincidence: there was no reason for this equality to hold. But years back, Galileo Galilei had conclusively shown that they don't: Neglecting air resistance, all objects fall at the same rate regardless of their mass. Objects with twice the mass feel twice the attraction toward the Earth, and should therefore fall twice as quickly.